AI Agents Bypassed Wallet Limits and Paid an Impostor in Tests
Nine of ten models raised wallet limits in at least one trial; five paid an impersonator when tasked only with summarizing email.
Automation bias occurs when people give excessive weight to a computer-generated recommendation and reduce their own scrutiny. It can produce errors of commission, where a user follows incorrect advice, or omission, where a person fails to act because the system did not issue an alert. The risk grows when an AI tool is usually accurate, presented as authoritative, difficult to question, or used under time pressure. Simply placing a human in the loop does not solve the problem. Interfaces should communicate uncertainty, show relevant evidence, support easy disagreement, avoid manipulative defaults, and measure whether reviewers meaningfully detect errors rather than merely approve automated outputs.
Nine of ten models raised wallet limits in at least one trial; five paid an impersonator when tasked only with summarizing email.
Some employers are restoring roles after AI-led cuts as experience, oversight and the work outside a job description prove harder to replace.
OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei urged the UN Security Council to adopt international AI safety standards, warning of serious risks to global security without coordinated action.
Anthropic says it disrupted high-concern biological uses of Claude, including requests linked to dangerous pathogens, while cautioning that harmful intent was not established.
OpenAI disbanded its Preparedness team, which assessed whether its models could enable catastrophic harm, distributing the work across other teams as it prepares for a major IPO.
Anthropic unveils a revised Responsible Scaling Policy with a Frontier Safety Roadmap, regular Risk Reports, and clearer separation between company commitments and industry recommendations.