Artificial intelligence is reshaping how work gets done, but its adoption is not evenly distributed across the workforce. New research from Lean In highlights a growing gender gap in how employees use AI tools, raising concerns about long-term impacts on career advancement and workplace equity.
The findings show that men are more likely than women to integrate AI into their daily workflows. Around 33% of men report using AI tools daily or constantly at work, compared to 27% of women. Men are also slightly more likely to have used AI at all, with 78% reporting some usage versus 73% of women.
Beyond usage, attitudes toward AI differ significantly. Men are more likely to express positive and energized views about AI adoption, while women report higher levels of caution and concern. Women are 20% more likely to feel threatened by AI and significantly more likely to worry about how their use of such tools might be perceived by colleagues.
These perceptions may influence adoption behavior. Women are more likely to question the accuracy of AI outputs and to express ethical concerns about its use. While these considerations reflect a more cautious and critical approach, they may also slow adoption in environments where rapid experimentation is rewarded.
Structural Barriers and Career Implications
The research also points to structural differences in how AI adoption is supported and recognized within organizations. Among employees who use AI at work, men are more likely to receive positive feedback for doing so. Approximately 23% of men report being praised for AI use, compared to 18% of women.
Managerial support also differs. Men are more likely to be encouraged to use AI tools, with 37% reporting such support versus 30% of women. This gap in encouragement can influence both skill development and confidence, potentially reinforcing disparities over time.
Concerns about job security further shape adoption patterns. Women are nearly twice as likely as men to believe that AI-driven layoffs will disproportionately affect female employees. This perception may contribute to hesitancy in adopting tools that are seen as both beneficial and potentially disruptive.
The implications extend beyond short-term productivity gains. As AI becomes more embedded in workflows, familiarity with these tools is increasingly tied to performance, efficiency, and career progression. Lower adoption rates today could translate into reduced access to opportunities in the future.
The findings suggest that organizations may need to take a more proactive role in ensuring equitable access to AI tools, training, and support. Without intervention, early differences in adoption could widen into more significant gaps in skills, recognition, and advancement across the workforce.