SpaceXAI, the company formerly known as xAI and now part of Elon Musk’s SpaceX, launched Grok 4.5, calling it its strongest model yet and one built for coding, agentic tasks and knowledge work. Unusually, the same model shipped under two brands the same day: it was trained jointly with Cursor, the AI coding tool whose parent SpaceX acquired in June, and Cursor released it as its most capable model.
Grok 4.5 was trained across tens of thousands of Nvidia GB300 GPUs on SpaceXAI’s Colossus infrastructure, using trillions of tokens of Cursor data, including real developer interactions with codebases, plus broader science, engineering and math material.
The model’s real pitch is economics, not raw capability. Grok 4.5 is priced at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, well below comparable frontier models, and runs at about 80 tokens per second.
Its standout feature is token efficiency: SpaceXAI says it solves tasks in under half the steps of rivals, using roughly 4.2 times fewer output tokens than Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 on the SWE-Bench Pro test, which sharply lowers the real cost of a completed task.
Musk described it as an “Opus-class model, but faster, more token-efficient and lower cost,” while adding that his internal assessment puts it roughly on par with the older Opus 4.7. The Cursor tie-up gives SpaceXAI a valuable feedback loop from how programmers actually write and debug code, and a ready distribution channel inside a tool developers already use.
An important correction is warranted on the benchmark claims. Some coverage framed Grok 4.5 as beating Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.8 across the board, but SpaceXAI’s own published charts tell a more modest story.
Anthropic’s Fable 5 leads all four coding benchmarks SpaceXAI cited, and Opus 4.8 beats Grok 4.5 on a couple of them; Grok 4.5’s best showing is a near-tie with Fable 5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 83.3%. Independent tracker Artificial Analysis places Grok 4.5 behind Fable 5, GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8 on overall intelligence. In other words, it is competitive and efficient rather than the outright leader, and all these figures are self-reported.